Barbadian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,918,808 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 18.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 46.2%), householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $67,333, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $111,286, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $53,294, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $42,446, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $51,246, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 66.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.67%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 156.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 21.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 62.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 55.5%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.0%).