Potawatomi vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,819,788 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.966. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.627% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 626.8 New Zealanders.
Potawatomi Integration in New Zealander Communities

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,046 compared to $50,575, a difference of 32.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $111,286, a difference of 31.5%), and median household income ($72,576 compared to $95,146, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $53,294, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $42,446, a difference of 22.2%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.2%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Fair
82.6%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.5%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.35%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.87%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Excellent
30.3%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
6.5%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 67.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.5%

Potawatomi vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.0%).
Potawatomi vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%