Immigrants from Mexico vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,785,620 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $50,575, a difference of 49.0%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $115,230, a difference of 37.8%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $61,199, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $67,333, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 70.4%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.8%), and family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.7%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 126.6%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 125.2%), and no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%), male disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.5%).