Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,155,628 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $50,575, a difference of 27.0%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $115,230, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $111,286, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $53,294, a difference of 9.3%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $42,446, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $51,246, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.4%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.24%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.48%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.44%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).