Native Hawaiian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,001,901 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 0.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $50,575, a difference of 23.3%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $61,199, a difference of 17.0%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $51,246, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $67,333, a difference of 5.5%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $95,146, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.50%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.4%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.7%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 58.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.5%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.4%).