Uruguayan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,149,547 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 38.8 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,656 compared to $115,230, a difference of 14.5%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $50,575, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $61,199, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $42,446, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.6%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.14%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.46%).