Hungarian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,657,519 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.439% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 439.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,426 compared to $50,575, a difference of 11.3%), median household income ($86,920 compared to $95,146, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $67,333, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $53,294, a difference of 6.1%), and median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $61,199, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.86%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.74%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.7%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%).