Moroccan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,886,534 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $67,333, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $111,286, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($41,872 compared to $42,446, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($48,838 compared to $51,246, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.62%), family households (61.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.37%).