Celtic vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,599,633 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.346% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 345.5 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $50,575, a difference of 15.9%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $95,146, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $115,230, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $42,446, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.23%), currently married (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.0%).