Guatemalan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,446,597 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 11.9 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $50,575, a difference of 33.9%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $61,199, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $115,230, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $42,446, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 58.3%), receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.4%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.070%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 77.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.1%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.84%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.8%).