Immigrants from El Salvador vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,533,617 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,394 compared to $50,575, a difference of 31.7%), median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $61,199, a difference of 27.6%), and median family income ($92,545 compared to $115,230, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $53,294, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $67,333, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $42,446, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.2%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.7%), single female poverty (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.9%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (67.0% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 132.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 73.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).