Immigrants from Taiwan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,535,956 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 10.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $105,085, a difference of 22.9%), median household income ($116,460 compared to $95,146, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $111,286, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $53,294, a difference of 11.5%), and per capita income ($57,742 compared to $50,575, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 42.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.9%), divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (50.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.0%).