Norwegian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,489,665 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 4.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,480 compared to $50,575, a difference of 13.7%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $95,146, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $67,333, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.31%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $111,286, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.64%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.1%), currently married (50.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.90%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.2%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%).