Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tlingit-Haida

New Zealanders

Average
Excellent
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,842,321 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 New Zealanders.
Tlingit-Haida Integration in New Zealander Communities

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $61,199, a difference of 16.8%), per capita income ($43,516 compared to $50,575, a difference of 16.2%), and wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $53,294, a difference of 4.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $67,333, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $42,446, a difference of 7.4%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,516
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,092
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,968
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,468
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,409
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,513
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,914
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,987
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,417
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,922
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and male poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Good
10.9%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 155.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.3%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.86%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.5%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Fair
82.6%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.9%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (61.6% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
Family Households
Tragic
61.6%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.2%
Excellent
30.3%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.5%

Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.3%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Tlingit-Haida vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricTlingit-HaidaNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.2%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.1%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%