Alsatian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,982,503 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 200.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.4%), median household income ($85,053 compared to $95,146, a difference of 11.9%), and median family income ($103,010 compared to $115,230, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $42,446, a difference of 6.0%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $50,575, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $53,294, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 22.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.1%), single father poverty (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.43%), and family households (61.7% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.43%).