Cuban vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,553,297 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $45,371, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $78,960, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,580 compared to $46,594, a difference of 0.030%), median earnings ($40,619 compared to $39,648, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($84,981 compared to $82,560, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 55.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family households (67.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.6%), births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.18%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.9%).