Indian (Asian) vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,534,535 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $74,847, a difference of 59.7%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $67,715, a difference of 55.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $78,960, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $45,371, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $51,949, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 80.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 71.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 48.7%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.3%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 80.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 116.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 110.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 90.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.2%).