Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belarus

Creek

Good
Fair
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,717,127 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Creek.
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $74,847, a difference of 43.5%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $35,546, a difference of 41.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $78,960, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $51,949, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $45,371, a difference of 22.9%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,303
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,586
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,399
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,043
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,658
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,757
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,743
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,393
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,430
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,162
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 65.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 60.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.1%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 46.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.82%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 115.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.2%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.9%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 79.7%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 78.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.12%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 74.0%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelarusCreek
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%