Immigrants from Asia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,399,046 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $74,847, a difference of 48.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $78,960, a difference of 47.6%), and median household income ($99,933 compared to $67,715, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.62%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $45,371, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $51,949, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 68.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 65.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 40.3%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.2%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 77.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 78.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%).