Native Hawaiian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,400,043 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $51,949, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $78,960, a difference of 33.2%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $67,715, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.7%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $46,594, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $39,648, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 49.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.3%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.1%).