Immigrants from Ecuador vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,554,489 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $74,847, a difference of 19.8%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $67,715, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $51,949, a difference of 4.0%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $46,594, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $39,648, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 206.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 69.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 88.2%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 57.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%).