Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Creek

Poor
Fair
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,784,603 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 27.4 Creek.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Creek Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $74,847, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $45,371, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $51,949, a difference of 6.6%), median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $46,594, a difference of 10.8%), and median family income ($94,665 compared to $82,560, a difference of 14.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
27.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 30.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
77.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
37.6%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 231.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 84.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 24.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 50.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 75.0%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
7.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 91.9%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 47.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 93.0%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 80.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCreek
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%