Malaysian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,934,078 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 11.5 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,064 compared to $67,715, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $78,960, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $74,847, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.3%), median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $46,594, a difference of 9.0%), and per capita income ($39,194 compared to $35,546, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 33.5%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 68.8%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.7%).