Osage vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,226,990 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 40.6 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $74,847, a difference of 12.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $78,960, a difference of 11.9%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $82,560, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.23%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $45,371, a difference of 0.87%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $51,949, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 23.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.66%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.88%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.2%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.4%).