Yakama vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,854,694 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.343% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 343.2 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,992 compared to $78,960, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,354 compared to $33,437, a difference of 0.25%), median earnings ($39,107 compared to $39,648, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $82,560, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.5%), receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 51.5%), and married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 136.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 81.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.9%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (44.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 79.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 116.7%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and associate's degree (32.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.91%).