Immigrants from Latin America vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,443,464 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $67,715, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $46,594, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $51,949, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($41,049 compared to $39,648, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 35.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.9%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (67.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.72%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 100.6%), high school diploma (82.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.81%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.0%).