Bhutanese vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,346,067 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $78,960, a difference of 49.1%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $67,715, a difference of 47.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $74,847, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.54%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $45,371, a difference of 25.8%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $33,437, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 81.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 75.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 72.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 71.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.0%).