Tongan vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tongans

Creek

Good
Fair
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Tongan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,845,922 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.927. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.302% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to an increase of 302.1 Creek.
Tongan Integration in Creek Communities

Tongan vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $78,960, a difference of 37.6%), median household income ($93,076 compared to $67,715, a difference of 37.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,604 compared to $74,847, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($53,218 compared to $46,594, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($38,288 compared to $33,437, a difference of 14.5%).
Tongan vs Creek Income
Income MetricTonganCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,693
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,967
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,076
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,665
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,218
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,288
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,972
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,604
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,643
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,235
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
27.1%

Tongan vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 71.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 67.1%), and single father poverty (12.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.2%).
Tongan vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricTonganCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Tongan vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Tongan vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTonganCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Tongan vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Tongan vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTonganCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Tragic
77.7%

Tongan vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 32.4%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (48.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (69.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Tongan vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTonganCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
69.6%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
31.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.6%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
37.6%

Tongan vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.62%), no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 9.0%).
Tongan vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTonganCreek
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.5%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
7.2%

Tongan vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.14%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
Tongan vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricTonganCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%

Tongan vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 60.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.0%).
Tongan vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricTonganCreek
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%