Immigrants from China vs Creek Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,262,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 61.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Creek
Minimum	1.1%	5.1%
Maximum	24.4%	77.8%
Range	23.3%	72.7%
Mean	12.0%	31.3%
Median	11.4%	28.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	19.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	40.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	20.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	15.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	15.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%

Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 21.4%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 21.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 21.5%
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 21.5%
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 21.6%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 21.6%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 21.6%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 21.7%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 21.7%
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 21.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 22.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 22.1%
Hondurans	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 22.2%