Brazilian vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Creek

Good
Fair
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,642,483 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Creek.
Brazilian Integration in Creek Communities

Brazilian vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $78,960, a difference of 32.2%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $35,546, a difference of 31.4%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $67,715, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $51,949, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.8%).
Brazilian vs Creek Income
Income MetricBrazilianCreek
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Brazilian vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 48.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 46.7%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.8%).
Brazilian vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianCreek
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Brazilian vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Brazilian vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianCreek
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%

Brazilian vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
Brazilian vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
77.7%

Brazilian vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.44%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.50%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.98%).
Brazilian vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianCreek
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
37.6%

Brazilian vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.8%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.8%).
Brazilian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianCreek
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.2%

Brazilian vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 61.2%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Brazilian vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianCreek
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Brazilian vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 60.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.0%).
Brazilian vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianCreek
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%