Tsimshian vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Creek
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,845,786 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 57.8 Creek.
Tsimshian vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $74,847, a difference of 30.7%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $67,715, a difference of 23.1%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $82,560, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,594, a difference of 4.8%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $39,648, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $51,949, a difference of 12.0%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 27.1% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 89.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 64.3%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 110.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 84.7%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 77.7% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 37.6% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 11.0%), college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Tsimshian vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), male disability (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |