Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Creek
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,803,659 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 84.6 Creek.
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 25.1%), median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $46,594, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $45,371, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($82,216 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.42%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $35,546, a difference of 0.49%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $51,949, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.9%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 77.7% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (39.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.96%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.0%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 54.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |