Arapaho vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,839,516 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 20.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $51,949, a difference of 14.3%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $46,594, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $67,715, a difference of 0.37%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.61%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $45,371, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 30.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 113.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 102.8%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 25.4%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.20, a difference of 13.6%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%).