Czech vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,223,548 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 20.4 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $78,960, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $74,847, a difference of 29.0%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $82,560, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $33,437, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 56.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.7%).