Immigrants from Argentina vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,363,425 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to an increase of 17.8 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,627 compared to $35,546, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $78,960, a difference of 37.1%), and median household income ($92,417 compared to $67,715, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $51,949, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 57.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 51.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 24.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.28%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.2%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 70.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 81.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.2%).