White/Caucasian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,469,932 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $78,960, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $74,847, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $67,715, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $45,371, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $33,437, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 33.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.87%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.6%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 7th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.91%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.7%).