Navajo vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Navajo
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Navajo
Bhutanese
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Navajo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,720,577 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Bhutanese.
Navajo vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $49,894, a difference of 71.9%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $100,151, a difference of 69.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $117,750, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.7%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $43,648, a difference of 32.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $57,078, a difference of 34.7%).
Income Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,031 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,989 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,159 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,999 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,098 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,046 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $42,380 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $66,529 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,759 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $47,722 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 189.4%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 166.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (30.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 141.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 57.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 66.5%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 78.8%).
Poverty Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 114.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 102.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 101.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.1% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 64.8% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 73.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 73.8% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 84.7%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 67.5%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.65 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.0% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.3%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 82.3%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Education Level Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.8% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Navajo vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 57.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.2%).
Disability Metric | Navajo | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.3% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |