Samoan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,706,025 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 38.5 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $49,894, a difference of 25.3%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $61,759, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($100,344 compared to $119,800, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $57,078, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $72,288, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.11%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.2%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 63.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.3%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.2%).