Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,836,232 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 70.5 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $49,894, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($64,987 compared to $61,759, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,930 compared to $117,750, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($99,813 compared to $100,151, a difference of 0.34%), and median female earnings ($44,366 compared to $43,648, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.54%), male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.4%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.41%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.0%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.58%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.97%).