Chilean vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 242,220,926 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 84.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $72,288, a difference of 13.0%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $100,151, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $119,800, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $43,648, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $57,078, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.7%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.60%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%).