Thai vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,545,564 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $61,759, a difference of 16.8%), median earnings ($59,237 compared to $52,297, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $72,288, a difference of 0.26%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $57,078, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($54,307 compared to $49,894, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 16.0%), family households with children (30.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.88%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and bachelor's degree (50.1% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.0%), male disability (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%).