Arapaho vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Bhutanese
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,013,453 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 320.0 Bhutanese.
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $117,750, a difference of 55.0%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,894, a difference of 54.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $109,520, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $72,288, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $57,078, a difference of 29.7%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 98.1%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 79.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 30.5%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 183.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 146.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 146.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 69.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.25, a difference of 11.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 99.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.2%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Arapaho vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 53.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |