Immigrants from China vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,468,872 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Bhutanese
Minimum	0.83%	0.70%
Maximum	42.3%	38.6%
Range	41.4%	37.9%
Mean	12.6%	11.3%
Median	10.7%	9.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	6.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.9%	15.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.2%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.1%	7.0%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Asians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.5%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 11.1%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 11.7%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 12.3%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 12.5%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 12.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 12.7%
Burmese	99.9 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 13.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 13.0%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 13.1%
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.2%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.2%