Tohono O'odham vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,802,063 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.155% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 154.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $119,800, a difference of 65.9%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $49,894, a difference of 64.9%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $100,151, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $57,078, a difference of 26.1%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $43,648, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 189.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 173.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 153.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.0%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 68.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 70.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 105.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 102.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 93.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 80.9%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 78.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 79.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 91.1%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 77.1%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 87.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 70.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 20.5%).