Irish vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,130,960 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.561. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Irish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Irish corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,097 compared to $72,288, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($86,145 compared to $100,151, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,067 compared to $117,750, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.5%), median male earnings ($56,464 compared to $61,759, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($47,276 compared to $52,297, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.62%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 15.6%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (91.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Irish and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%).