Hawaiian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,056,968 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 36.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $49,894, a difference of 26.6%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $61,759, a difference of 22.3%), and median family income ($98,869 compared to $119,800, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $57,078, a difference of 7.5%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $72,288, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.2%).