Kiowa vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Bhutanese

Poor
Exceptional
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,425,948 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 23.2 Bhutanese.
Kiowa Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $117,750, a difference of 57.4%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $100,151, a difference of 51.9%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $119,800, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $57,078, a difference of 27.6%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $43,648, a difference of 28.1%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricKiowaBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
27.0%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 85.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 83.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.8%), and single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 38.4%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaBhutanese
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaBhutanese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
83.5%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 54.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.66%), and family households (61.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaBhutanese
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Exceptional
27.9%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.0%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 76.4%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 58.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Kiowa vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 76.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.9%).
Kiowa vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricKiowaBhutanese
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%