Osage vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,158,386 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $117,750, a difference of 33.2%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $100,151, a difference of 33.1%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $119,800, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.31%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $43,648, a difference of 21.1%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $52,297, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 48.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.38%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.9%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.3%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.8%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.5%).