Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Bhutanese

Good
Exceptional
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,481,743 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.862% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to a decrease of 862.3 Bhutanese.
Taiwanese Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $72,288, a difference of 14.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $57,078, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.3%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $49,894, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $43,648, a difference of 7.6%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.0%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.50%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.5%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
27.9%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.8%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.71%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.070%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Taiwanese vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseBhutanese
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%