Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,169,467 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.105% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to a decrease of 105.5 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $72,288, a difference of 16.1%), median household income ($91,015 compared to $100,151, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $117,750, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($48,747 compared to $49,894, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $43,648, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple households (46.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 55.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.0%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (51.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.81%).